Randy Gregory, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers linebacker and former Broncos and Cowboys player, is taking legal action against the NFL and his former team, the Denver Broncos, over the hefty fines he received for using marijuana. Despite the NFL’s recent leniency towards cannabis, players can still face fines for its use. Gregory is seeking to reclaim over $500,000 in fines he has incurred.

In his lawsuit under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, Gregory argues that he requires THC to manage his social anxiety disorder and PTSD. The civil complaint from Gregory states: “Mr. Gregory requested an accommodation from the NFL and Broncos to consume Dronabinol to treat his disabilities.”

He sought to use Dronabinol, a synthetic form of cannabis, as directed by his physician during non-work hours. However, both the NFL and the Broncos denied his request on the grounds that THC is a federally controlled substance.

Since making his accommodation request, Gregory has paid a substantial sum of $532,500 in penalties to the NFL for using THC to address his disabilities. Despite testing positive for THC, Gregory is still expected to participate in games, attend practices and media sessions, and fulfill his job responsibilities.

The lawsuit highlights that “Regardless of a positive test, Mr. Gregory is expected to play in every game, attend practice, attend media sessions, and fulfil his job responsibilities. In other words, he cannot be suspended for a positive test alone. Significantly, the NFL and the Broncos profited from Mr. Gregory’s continued employment.”

Gregory argues NFL and Broncos profited from his cannabis use for disabilities

The case sheds light on the evolving stance of the NFL regarding cannabis use and the rights of players with medical needs. It also brings attention to the complexities surrounding the use of marijuana for medical purposes within the professional sports industry.

This legal action by Gregory raises important questions about the rights of players to access medical treatments that are essential for their well-being. It also prompts a closer examination of the policies and accommodations provided by sports organizations for players with medical conditions.

The lawsuit initiated by Gregory underscores the need for ongoing discussions and potential reforms within professional sports leagues to ensure that players with legitimate medical needs are treated fairly and have access to necessary treatments without facing financial penalties.